SEX ABUSE EDUCATION (so called) for First Grade Girls and Boys
The humanists have written plainly in their own publications these things:
1. They claim to be winning the war for our children in the classrooms
2. They say they are winning the battle "over the rotting corpse of Christianity..."
3. Humanists realize that premature exposure to sex aids them in getting children to be sexually promiscuous at earlier ages.
Christian writters have written: Children are being exposed to undue emotional strain and burdens under the disquise of helping them with sex abuse education.
Children's emotional trust and bonds to their parents are being weakened by early exposure to sex and warnings that the parents themselves might be trying to hurt the children.
Notice that these warnings come from state officials. Remember that the state is all too glad to take over the care and responsibility of raising up your children. The state wants the children to be model citizens of the new world order. Just read the literature from WFISD. There is no reference to being children in the kingdom of God, but there is ample reference to being citizens of the new world economy. And the new world economy wants to do away with reference to God. These things are plainly stated in many sources.
Go read again the book Brave New World. See how the state conditions children to think like the state wants. That should be the job of loving caring parents. Then consider what is happening in our schools. Look at the posters on the walls. Read the stories your first graders and third graders are reading. If you need help discovering the arsenic in the milk, then come ask for someone to show you. It doesn't take a whole lot of arsenic all at once to make someone sick. There is way too much arsenic being fed to the children in public schools, and it needs to be stopped. There's one thing about poisons such as arsenic. They are not obvious. They are hidden and concealed. It takes a wise man to discover the poison. Parent's Information Network wants to show you the evidence of what poison is being fed to the children.
The original reason for giving this information was to protect children from pre-mature exposure to emotionally heavy subjects such as sex-abuse education. There has been a national effort to expose children to sex-abuse courses as early as kindergarten. In many places, local city included, the powers that be did not wish parents to learn about the program because they said, How can we catch the bad parents if we warn them in advance of talking to their children? Well, I don't think that is an American way of doing things. I think that is a dictatorial, hidden government way of doing things. So I started trying to get parents interested enough to stand up for their own children. Some said, "Well, whatever the state thinks is best for my child, that's ok with me." Others got angry when they discovered that such things had been perpetrated behind their back, with predetermined intent to keep them in the dark as to what was going on with their child.
I am in the group that got angry. I had to forgive those who did go behind my back to my own daughter and those who participated in suggesting to her that her own daddy might be trying to mess her up. This was a first grade program here in a local elementary school. The lady who taught the course told me she had been mistreated by her dad when she was very young, and she therefore had the right to go and tell my daughter that her own family might be hurting her. In eight years of doing this practice at one elementary school, they found one little girl they could help through their secret program. I am telling you that I took my own poll that year of dad's and found over 20% of the little girls had an extremely adverse and fearful reaction to that program. To help one little girl in eight years is wonderful, but it does not deserve that 20% of all the girls be hurt.
REVOLVING DOORS When the school system ran me through revolving doors, referring me from one authority to another within the system, no one wanting to take responsibility, finally I went to the Superintendent and asked for a parent's map to the school system. I explained my situation, how I had been to several different places to see different people as they each referred me to someone else. I asked how could I avoid such wasted time. He told me there was no map like I wanted. He said, just follow the trail, and eventually all trails led to him. He then pointed to a wall full of books and said the rules were in those books and he was the authority to interpret them. I could see I was at a considerable disadvantage since he had the final word on the law of the land as far as it concerned parents in our school system.
So the powerful head of the school system told me that the PTA was the avenue I should use to get my feedback into the school.
I went to the PTA people I knew, and was able to get no results.
At one point I was told that a school system paid employee directed that the PTA could not do what I as a parent wanted to do.
At another point, I was told by a PTA ranking person, the president, that the PTA could only do those things that were directed from the state or national level.
Another words, the local pta was in name only so far as information for the sake of the parents was concerned. If an idea did not originate from the state or higher level, if it was only approved by parents and not by the state level then it could not be done.
So, I learned that the PTA was good for letting me see my children sing, and letting me pay for tickets that raised money for the state and national PTA salaries and expenses of well paid PTA officials.
The PTA did not want to send this information home to parents about the sex program for first graders.
The newspaper did not want to print it.
The radio didnot want to say it. The tv did not want to show it.
The school system did not want to send information home to the parents about it.
So I passed out literature myself. Now I put it on the world wide web for any one to read.
As of 1996, the principals in WFISD decided to put this program on their calenders. I never saw any information about potential harmful effect.
I never saw any other information sent to the parents about it. But to their credit, the schools did print the agenda on their calender, not that many parents knew what it was, but that is a good step in the right direction of letting parent's know what the school is telling their children.
By the fall of 1997, it is my personal goal for the parents to be more fully informed on this national controversy about child sex abuse in the schools.
Many defend it vigorously, saying they need to protect the children.
I say, it is not good for the children when the state goes behind parents backs to endoctrinate children.
The state is wrong when it justifies itself in going behind parent's backs to endoctrinate children.
By endoctrination, I mean anything that changes attitudes, faith, confidence, trust, beliefs, and or sets up fears or introduces new concerns for worry or doubt.
Divided we fall, united we stand. My vision is to unite parents in a truth they believe is right for their children. When parents know what is going on and do what is right and good, then they have fulfilled God's commandment towards their children.
Send comment to Christian Parents Information Network